IPR Ensures Safeguards for Indian Pharma
Industry
The policy comes in the backdrop of the US
Trade Representative (USTR), in its annual (2016 edition) Special 301 Report
(on the Global State of IPR Protection and Enforcement) retaining India on the
‘Priority Watch List’ this year for “lack of sufficient measurable improvements
to its IPR framework.” Though the U.S. concerns include the “rejections” of
patent applications for innovative pharmaceutical products due to
“unpredictable” application of Section 3(d) of the (Indian) Patents Act, the
policy ensure that no changes are made in that Section (which prevents
ever-greening of drug patents) and the patent-disabling Compulsory Licensing(
CL) regime.
In fact, the IPR Policy states “India shall
remain committed to the (World Trade Organization’s) Doha Declaration on
(WTO’s) Trade Related IPR Agreement (TRIPS) and Public Health”. There was,
however, a bit of apprehension that mention of Doha Declaration and flexibility
would mean there would be attempts to find loopholes in TRIPS in order to
favour pharmaceutical companies. It also says “India will continue to utilize
the legislative space and flexibilities available in international treaties and
the TRIPS Agreement.” These flexibilities include the sovereign right of
countries to use provisions such as Section 3(d) and CLs for ensuring the
availability of essential and life-saving drugs at affordable prices.
The IPR Policy says that to have strong and
effective IPR laws, which balance the interests of rights owners with larger
public interest, steps could be taken — including review of existing IP laws —
to update and improve them or to remove anomalies and inconsistencies. The
review will be done in consultation with stakeholders. The changes in the laws
will be those relating to the Rules on patents, trademarks, copyrights and
other IPRs, but the changes will not go beyond India’s commitments at the
WTO-level.
No comments:
Post a Comment